Don't miss a digital issue! Renew/subscribe for FREE today.
×
Inside Dentistry
October 2013
Volume 9, Issue 10

Infection Control in the Dental Office: Compliance Revisited

Self-examination is the first step to ensuring safety

Marie T. Fluent, DDS

One may look at the most recent breach of infection control within the oral surgery clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and merely shake one’s head. This facility has exposed as many as 7000 patients to HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C over a 6-year period. Of the patients who received treatment at this clinic and were tested for blood-borne pathogens, 74 tested positive for hepatitis C, five for hepatitis B, and three for HIV as of June 20, 2013.

Inspections by the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry reported numerous violations of infection control protocols in this facility, including unsanitary and unsafe conditions, improper dispensing of medications, and illegal administration of intravenous sedation by dental assistants. This news story created media hype, stirred state and national dental board awareness, generated panic among patients of this clinic, and increased patient concerns throughout the country.

It is tempting to simply be outraged at this doctor and his staff for infection control noncompliance and inattention to infection control protocol within the office. How dare they put patients at risk and shed such a negative light on the practice of dentistry? We must ask ourselves, how could this happen? How could an office so blatantly ignore our profession’s infection control protocol (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] guidelines and Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] regulations) and drastically lean toward noncompliance and negligence?

Unfortunately, it often requires an incident of this sort and magnitude to bring the importance of infection control back to the forefront of our priority list. Fortunately, this is likely an isolated event; the vast majority of dentists are diligent, compliant, and follow proper protocols within their dental practices. This case serves as a dramatic reminder, however, that although infection transmission rarely occurs in the dental setting, when it does, the consequences may be severe, highly publicized, and possibly lethal.

As a busy practice owner, I acknowledge that it is easy to become inattentive and allow compliance to wane. Other, more pressing tasks and concerns fill our days. In addition to treating patients, we must attend to the business of dentistry, market our practices, stay current in our field, and manage our staffs. Our to-do list seems endless, and attention to infection control protocol may feel like one more chore to which we must attend. Unlike other tasks of office ownership, the practice of safe dentistry is not glamorous, it is not revenue producing, and the fruits from our efforts are not immediately evident. Thus, compliance may easily slip from our priority list.

National media hype and attention has brought has brought the importance of infection control in the dental setting to the minds of our patients. They have been educated to look for general cleanliness, a neat and decluttered instrument processing area, and clinical personnel washing hands and donning gloves. As clinicians and dental team members, we know that successful implementation of infection control program is much more involved and complicated than what a patient may observe. The safe practice of dentistry involves leadership, staff education, knowledge of and adherence to protocol and regulations, constant attention, and a continuous strive for compliance.

The CDC recommends and OSHA mandates that dental health care personnel receive infection control training upon initial assignment, when new tasks may affect their exposure risks, and, at a minimum, annually. The occurrence of this Tulsa incident serves as a reminder that now is an opportune time to re-evaluate the protocol within our dental facilities. As we reflect on our safe practice of dentistry, we may consider the following: Are our dental teams adequately educated and current with regard to infection control guidelines and regulations? Have we created a collaborative atmosphere where infection prevention is a team-based responsibility? Are clinical personnel attentive, diligent, and striving for compliance?

A self-audit checklist is a comprehensive and systematic method to evaluate infection control protocol within our clinics. It serves as a useful aid to quickly evaluate our practices and ensure that they are within the standard of care. Such a list may ask pertinent questions in the key areas of any successful program. The administration of the office-specific program and a review of blood-borne pathogens and how they are transmitted should first be addressed. Other topics to be included are hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, disinfection and sterilization of patient care items, and the cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces and dental unit waterlines. Special considerations that are pertinent to specific facilities may also include maintenance of dental handpieces, administration of parenteral medications, and infection control considerations for surgical procedures and the dental laboratory.

Although this list is not intended to be all-inclusive or guarantee that our offices are OSHA compliant, it serves as a useful tool to highlight areas where infection control protocol may be weak and necessitate further attention, education, and training. Clinicians may address specific topics in greater depth through the additional resources provided.

Hopefully, we have all learned a great lesson from this incident. Implementation of and compliance to an infection control program are not optional in the practice of dentistry. It is our responsibility to maintain a safe environment for our patients, our staff, and ourselves. Effective infection prevention is a team-based responsibility requiring continuous education, attention, diligence, and a constant strive for compliance.

It is in the best interest of every dental practice to make sure that employee safety training is up to date at least annually. This brief review of infection control policies and protocol may allow a clinical staff an opportunity to clarify and address infection control weaknesses within their practice. We should be proud of the care we provide to our patients and have confidence that we do so in a safe manner.

Marie T. Fluent, DDS, is general dentist in private practice in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

A printable version of Dr. Fluent's Infection Control Self-Audit Checklist is available here

Infection Control Resources

American Dental Association
www.ada.org

CDC Guidelines for Infection Control
www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/guidelines_cdc_infection.pdf

Organization for Safety Asepsis and Prevention
www.osap.org

© 2024 BroadcastMed LLC | Privacy Policy