Product Specials




Share:

Compendium

March 2012, Volume 33, Issue 3
Published by AEGIS Communications


Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment of a Mandibular First Molar with Five Canals: 1-Year Follow-up

Deepak J. Parekh, MDS; and Sathyanarayanan R., MDS

Abstract

Mandibular first molars have highly variable root canal morphology. According to previous studies, the occurrence of middle mesial canals ranges from 1% to 15%. In this case, nonsurgical endodontic retreatment of a mandibular first molar with a middle mesial canal is attempted. The authors describe the diagnosis and clinical management of a mandibular first molar with three mesial root canals, drawing particular attention to radiographic interpretation and access refinements.

Thorough knowledge of the root canal system and its variations is a key to successful endodontic treatment. To obtain a better visualization of the morphology present, magnification, illumination, several angulated radiographs, and careful methodical exploration are imperative.

Mandibular first molars present with complex anatomic variations.1,2 Normally, they have one mesial and distal root with two canals in the mesial root and one or two in the distal root.1-3 Middle mesial canals, which sometimes present in the developmental groove between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals, have an incidence ranging from 1% to 15%.1,3 The development of middle mesial canals occurs by secondary dentin apposition during tooth maturation, when a vertical dentinal partition forms inside the root canal cavity, the diameter of which is age-related.4 According to Ingle, one of the most important causes of endodontic treatment failure is the incomplete obturation of the root canal system.5 Similarly, it was reported that a considerable number of failures could be attributed to anatomical variations.3,6

This clinical case describes nonsurgical retreatment of a mandibular first molar with three mesial and two distal canals; it was followed-up for 12 months.

Case Report

A healthy 28-year-old male patient was referred to the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India, with spontaneous pain in the mandibular left first molar. Endodontic treatment had been completed 2 years previously. Radiographic evidence of periapical and furcation pathosis was present, and a radiopaque material seen in parts of the pulp canal system confirmed chronic apical periodontitis (Figure 1). Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment was planned. During access preparation, the coronal pulp chamber was found to contain amalgam and an unknown base.

Four independent canals were located, each leading to its own apical foramen. Gutta-percha was retrieved from the canals with the help of an H-file. During treatment, a depression was felt in the pulp chamber floor toward the center of the mesial root canal entrance. The lip of dentin covering this area was removed with a long shank round bur. The middle mesial canal was close to the mesiobuccal canal. The distal root showed two canals with two independent foramina, which were connected at the cervical third and had a common orifice in the pulp chamber floor. The working length was determined radiographically and corroborated with an apex locator. In the distoangular radiograph, the presence of a wide mesiobuccal canal with a rather pronounced curvature was seen (Figure 2). There was a middle mesial (intermediate) canal that converged with the mesiobuccal canal at the apex. The canal was shaped until it reached size 30 apically. A copious amount of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was used as an irrigant. Two-visit root canal therapy was planned due to the complexity of the canal system. The canals were dried with paper points and dressed with freshly mixed calcium hydroxide with glycerin. The access was then temporarily sealed with non-eugenol cement.

Two weeks later, the patient returned for obturation of the canal. The tooth was asymptomatic, and following final irrigation with saline the canals were dried with paper points and deemed ready for obturation. A radiograph was taken to confirm the extension of the master cone to the estimated working length (Figure 3). The tooth was then obturated with a cold lateral condensation technique using gutta-percha and an epoxy-based sealer. The obturation radiograph showed radiopacity between the middle mesial and mesiolingual canal, suggesting an isthmus (Figure 4). A coronal seal of composite was placed, followed by a porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) full-coverage crown. One-year recall showed a decrease in radiolucency in the furcation and periapical region, with no clinical signs of infection (Figure 5).

Discussion

Incomplete instrumentation, inadequate cleaning and shaping, and the subsequent defective obturation of root canals are the main causes of endodontic treatment failure.7 Anatomical variations are challenges routinely faced by practitioners performing endodontic treatment. The middle mesial canal, if present in a mandibular first molar, may have an independent foramen or may join the mesiobuccal (more frequently) or mesiolingual canal at the apical or middle third.8 In the literature, retreatment of a mandibular first molar with three canals in the mesial has been reported without any follow-up.9

The middle mesial canal can be classified as "fin" when the instrument can pass freely between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals and the middle mesial canal, "confluent" when the prepared canal originates as a separate orifice but apically joins the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual canal, or "independent" when the prepared canal originates as a separate orifice and terminates as a separate foramen.10 Fabra-Campos8 suggested the following steps to locate the middle mesial canal: Once the access cavity is made, a round bur can be used to eliminate the dentin from the mesial wall, or a thin explorer can be utilized from the orifice of the mesiobuccal canal toward the mesiolingual canal to search for any possible depression. Next, a file is used in an alternating 45-degree rotating motion to negotiate the canal; if the canal contains blood vessels, a spot of blood can be seen. After locating the canal, a small round bur or an ultrasonic tip can be used to widen the orifice.

Different studies1,8,10-12 of the morphologic structure of root canal systems have demonstrated a great disparity in number of canals, orifices, and anatomy (Table 1). Single-visit root canal therapy is not contradicted in such cases, but multiple-visit root canal therapy was planned due to the complexity of the canal system.13 In such cases, calcium hydroxide is used as a barrier against coronal leakage from temporary filling materials.14 There is no specific protocol for retreatment cases, but studies have shown that irrigation with sodium hypochlorite helps in eradication of infection in retreatment cases.15 Epoxy-based sealer was used, which has the advantage of AH-26 sealer but is less toxic.16

The surgical implication of such a clinical case is also important if nonsurgical retreatment fails. When apical surgery is performed on the mesial root, the apex should be resected at a 45-degree angle to enable the operator to prepare and obturate the canals. A small preparation of adequate depth and circumference should be made in each mesial canal and then connected. The connecting preparation should be made with satisfactory depth to allow for retention of the filling and should be widened adequately to accommodate the condensing instrument.10

The outcome of endodontic therapy is generally assessed 1 year after treatment. Measures of success for endodontic therapy include "complete healing" and "incomplete healing."17 Clinical normalcy combined with reduced radiolucency is seen in this case. Therefore, it is most important to completely clean and obturate the middle mesial canal to reduce the need for surgical endodontics.

Conclusion

Knowledge of dental anatomy is fundamental for good endodontic practice. Access of cavity refinements may be required for stress-free entry into complex anatomy. Intricate mandibular molar anatomy may be predictably managed following its proper identification and exploration.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Dr. Astha Singhal, Dental Public Health Resident, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, for her help in completing this manuscript.

References

1. Goel NK, Gill KS, Taneja JR. Study of root canals configuration in mandibular first permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1991;8(1):12-14.

2. Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(5):778-784.

3. Vertucci FJ, Williams RG. Root canal anatomy of mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc. 1974;45(3):27-28.

4. Holtzmann L. Root canal treatment of a mandibular first molar with three mesial root canals. Int Endod J. 1997;30(6):422-423.

5. Ingle JI. Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1985.

6. DeGrood ME, Cunningham CJ. Mandibular molar with 5 canals: report of a case. J Endod. 1997;23(1):60-62.

7. Sjogren U, Haggalund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16(10):498-504.

8. Fabra-Campos H. Unusual root anatomy of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 1985;11(12):568-572.

9. Weine FS. Case report: three canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar(?). J Endod. 1982;8(11):517-520.

10. Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal mandibular first and second molars. J Endod. 1981;7(12):565-568.

11. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589-599.

12. Fabra-Campos H. Three canals in the mesial roots of mandibular first permanent molars: a clinical study. Int Endod J. 1989;22(1):39-43.

13. Lin LM, Lin J, Rosenberg PA. One-appointment endodontic therapy: biological considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(11):1456-1462.

14. Kawashima N, Wadachi R, Suda H, et al. Root canal medicaments. Int Dent J. 2009;59(1):5-11.

15. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10:77-102.

16. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed. London, England: BC Decker Inc.; 2002:571-668.

17. Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Testori T, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical endodontic re-treatment for periradicular lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD005511.

About the Authors

Deepak J. Parekh, BDS
Postgraduate student
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Bapuji Dental College and Hospital
Davangere, India

Sathyanarayanan R., MDS
Professor
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Bapuji Dental College and Hospital
Davangere, India


Share this:

Image Gallery

Table 1 

Table 1

Figure 1  Preoperative radiograph with evidence of periapical and furcation pathosis.

Figure 1

Figure 2  Working-length radiograph showing the presence of a wide mesiobuccal canal with a rather pronounced curvature.

Figure 2

Figure 3  Master cone radiograph.

Figure 3

Figure 4  Post-obturation radiograph showing radiopacity between the middle mesial and mesiolingual canal, suggesting an isthmus.

Figure 4

Figure 5  One-year follow-up showing decrease in radiolucency in the periapical and furcation area.

Figure 5